School etc

Wood Green Junior School

Wood Green Junior School
Hobs Road
Wednesbury
West Midlands
WS109BW

0121 5560377

Headteacher: Mrs Carla Clarke

School holidays for Wood Green Junior School via Sandwell council

Check school holidays


234 pupils aged 7—10y mixed gender
232 pupils capacity: 101% full

115 boys 49%

7y318y269y2810y30

120 girls 51%

7y298y309y3110y29

Last updated: Oct. 2, 2014


Primary — Foundation School

URN
103913
Education phase
Primary
Establishment type
Foundation School
Establishment #
2051
OSGB coordinates
Easting: 399018, Northing: 295795
GPS coordinates
Latitude: 52.56, Longitude: -2.0159
Accepting pupils
7—11 years old
Census date
Jan. 16, 2014
Ofsted last inspection
Sept. 25, 2014
Region › Const. › Ward
West Midlands › West Bromwich West › Wednesbury North
Area
Urban > 10k - less sparse
Free school meals %
18.40
Trust school
Is supported by a Trust
Trust
Wednesday Learning Community Trust

Rooms & flats to rent in Wednesbury

Schools nearby

  1. 0.2 miles Albert Pritchard Infant School WS109QG (246 pupils)
  2. 0.2 miles St Mary's Catholic Primary School WS109PN (243 pupils)
  3. 0.4 miles Old Park Primary School WS109LX (498 pupils)
  4. 0.5 miles Stuart Bathurst Catholic High School College of Performing Arts WS109QS (821 pupils)
  5. 0.6 miles Mesty Croft Primary School WS100QY
  6. 0.6 miles Wood Green High School College of Sport, Maths and Computing WS109QU
  7. 0.6 miles Kings Hill Primary School WS109JG (310 pupils)
  8. 0.6 miles Wood Green Academy WS109QU (1493 pupils)
  9. 0.6 miles Mesty Croft Academy WS100QY (407 pupils)
  10. 0.6 miles St John's CofE Primary School WS107AL
  11. 0.7 miles Holyhead Primary School WS107PZ (210 pupils)
  12. 0.7 miles St John's CofE Primary School WS107AL (193 pupils)
  13. 0.8 miles Park Hill Primary School WS100TJ (259 pupils)
  14. 0.9 miles Tameside Infant School WS100EX
  15. 0.9 miles Tameside Junior School WS100EX
  16. 0.9 miles Salisbury Primary School WS108BQ (304 pupils)
  17. 0.9 miles Tameside Primary School WS100EZ (537 pupils)
  18. 1 mile Wodensborough Community Technology College WS100DR
  19. 1 mile Rowley View Nursery School WS107RU (80 pupils)
  20. 1 mile Wodensborough Ormiston Academy WS100DR (963 pupils)
  21. 1.1 mile Manor Foundation Business, Enterprise & Sports College WS100JS
  22. 1.1 mile Hillary Junior School WS29BP
  23. 1.1 mile Hillary Infant School WS29BP
  24. 1.1 mile Pinfold Street Primary School WS108PU (398 pupils)

List of schools in Wednesbury

Ofsted report transcript

School report

Wood Green Junior School

Hobs Road, Wednesbury, WS10 9BW

Inspection dates 25–26 September 2014
Overall effectiveness This inspection: Requires improvement 3
Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3
Leadership and management Good 2
Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2
Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3
Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
The school has the following strengths
Information about this inspection

Pupils are not reaching high enough standards in
Teaching in subjects such as science, history and
Pupils’ work across all year groups in a wide range
Literacy and numeracy skills have not been
subjects beyond English and mathematics.
geography has not been carried out effectively
enough for pupils to make good progress.
of subjects shows that they do not acquire
knowledge or develop understanding quickly and
securely.
developed effectively in other subjects. Spelling
mistakes and grammatical errors too often go
uncorrected.
Disadvantaged pupils’ attainment is below that of
Pupils are not always given clear enough guidance
Poor presentation and scruffy handwriting are
other pupils, although the gap is now narrowing
due to more systematic assessment and checking.
on how to improve their work. Teachers do not
always ensure that pupils act upon the corrections,
improvements or guidance that are given.
accepted in mathematics and topic work, in contrast
to pupils’ work in literacy.
The headteacher sets high standards for teaching
Good leadership has had a positive effect on
Pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing
The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social
and pupils’ progress. Her determined leadership,
supported by other leaders and governors, has
ensured that this is an improving school.
improving the quality of teaching since the
previous inspection.
and mathematics improved in 2014 from the
results in 2013.
and cultural development effectively.
There is a positive climate for learning evident in
The school manages behaviour well. It teaches
The governors accurately assess the school’s
the classrooms. Pupils work well together and
cooperate happily with each other.
pupils how to keep themselves safe. A large
majority of parents consider their children to be
happy, safe and well looked after.
performance and use the information to provide a
good degree of support and challenge to the
headteacher.
  • The school’s improvement plan, assessment records and tracking of pupils’ progress, self-evaluation and
    monitoring documents and teachers’ performance management procedures were evaluated.
  • The inspectors assessed the quality of teaching by observing lessons, looking at pupils’ work and talking to
    the pupils, the headteacher and other leaders.
  • Discussions were held with the headteacher, groups of pupils, members of the leadership team, and four
    members of the governing body.
  • The inspector discussed the school’s performance and capacity for improvement with a representative
    from the local authority.
  • The inspectors took account of the 27 responses to the online questionnaire for parents (Parent View) and
    emails submitted during the inspection. The inspectors also spoke informally to parents as they brought
    their children to school.
  • The inspectors reviewed the records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.
  • Inspectors heard pupils read, met with two groups of pupils and spoke to pupils informally.
  • Policies, procedures and records for the safeguarding of pupils were scrutinised.
  • Responses to the inspection questionnaire were received from 34 staff and their views taken into account.
    Inspection team
Michael Appleby, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
Sheelagh Barnes Additional Inspector

Full report

Information about this school

  • Wood Green Junior School is an average-sized junior school. It is federated with Albert Pritchard Infant
    School and has the same executive headteacher.
  • The very large majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds.
  • An above-average proportion of the pupils are eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional
    funding for pupils who are in local authority care or known to be eligible for free school meals.
  • The proportion of pupils supported at school action is above the national average. The proportion
    supported at school action plus or assessed with a statement of special educational needs is above
    average.
  • Pupils are taught in ability sets for mathematics and writing in Year 5 and Year 6.
  • The school did not meet the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’
    attainment and progress, in 2013 but did in 2014.

What does the school need to do to improve further?

  • Improve teaching across the school in all subjects, so all groups of pupils make the best possible progress,
    by ensuring that:
    work in all subjects accurately reflects pupils’ abilities, effectively challenges pupils and engages them
    fully in learning
    all staff show high expectations of pupils’ achievement, including the presentation of their work
    teachers mark and correct errors in pupils’ work consistently well
    pupils act on advice given by teachers through marking.
  • Improve the effectiveness of subject leaders by ensuring that they plan for, monitor and assess the
    development of reading and writing skills in their subjects.

Inspection judgements

The leadership and management are good
  • The headteacher is providing very strong and effective leadership. She has successfully introduced
    demanding and effective systems to improve the quality of teaching and learning. She is being well
    supported by the deputy headteacher, senior leaders and governors.
  • Leadership has been strengthened considerably since the previous inspection. Senior and middle leaders
    are playing an increasingly important role in improving the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement.
    Although some are only recently appointed they are already showing the potential to be effective leaders
    and bring about the further improvements the school needs to make.
  • The quality of teaching has improved because leaders and governors check it regularly and provide
    additional support and training where necessary, including deciding whether pay increases are to be
    awarded. Teachers have risen to the challenge, as is evident in the improvement in pupils’ attainment and
    progress results in reading, writing and mathematics in 2014.
  • The systems for checking pupils’ progress are robust and comprehensive. The school regularly reviews the
    data to check the progress of individual pupils and to identify any areas of underachievement and then to
    provide additional support if required.
  • The school has developed a broad, balanced and comprehensive curriculum plan which was introduced at
    the beginning of term. All subjects are carefully planned to enable pupils to learn the subject skills in a
    systematic and progressive way. This new curriculum will be linked to a new assessment system that is
    being developed with a cluster of other local schools.
  • Safeguarding procedures and policies to protect pupils are effective and meet statutory requirements. The
    site is safe and building security is effective. Appropriate audits and risk assessments are conducted and
    action taken if a concern arises.
  • The school has used the pupil premium funding effectively to employ teaching and other staff who have
    focused on giving support to eligible pupils who are identified as falling behind and in need of more
    individual or small group teaching. This has been particularly effective in mathematics. The allocation of
    the funding is discussed and agreed by the headteacher and the governors.
  • The school has made good use of the new primary sport funding to provide additional sporting activities
    including, for example, golf, dance and football. As a result, more pupils take part in physical activities and
    are developing new skills in a range of sports. They are having more opportunities to take part in inter-
    school competitions. In addition, specialists work alongside teachers to coach and develop their skills in
    teaching physical education. This is contributing effectively to developing healthy lifestyles and the
    physical well-being of pupils.
  • Following the previous inspection in 2012, the school has benefited from very effective and valuable
    support from the local authority to raise pupils’ achievement in English and mathematics and to improve
    the quality of teaching and learning.
  • The governance of the school:
    The work of the governing body has improved since the previous inspection. Governors have worked
    closely with the headteacher to evaluate the school’s performance and make sure that the right things
    are being done to bring about improvement, setting challenging targets.
    Governors have a good understanding of the information about pupils’ progress and of how the school
    is doing compared to similar schools nationally. They have a clear picture of the quality of teaching, and
    ensure that pay rewards for both teachers and the headteacher are closely related to performance.
    During the past 18 months they have worked closely with the headteacher to tackle the
    underperformance of several teachers.
    Governors manage the school budget effectively, including any extra government funding such as for
    that for primary school sports, and check that money is spent to positive effect. They know that the
    pupil premium has helped to close attainment gaps in mathematics, reading and writing.
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
  • The behaviour of pupils is good. They are eager to learn and enjoy most of the teaching they receive.
    Pupils work well together and cooperate happily with each other. Their positive attitudes to learning are
    contributing to the improving progress they are making.
  • Playtimes are harmonious and pupils from all backgrounds get on well with each other. Lunchtimes are
    calm and orderly. Some pupils take responsibility to keep the playground tidy and free of litter.
  • The behaviour policy is understood and implemented consistently well by all staff including midday
    supervisors, who are fully involved in its implementation. As a result, pupils play happily together at
    breaks and lunch-times, enjoying a range of physical activities and each other’s company.
  • Parental responses to the online questionnaire show that a small minority have concerns about behaviour
    and bullying. When questioned, however, pupils said that the behaviour of most pupils is good most of the
    time. Very little misbehaviour was observed during the inspection.
  • Attendance has been improved through the effective actions taken by the school. It was 96.5% for 2014,
    which is broadly in line with the national average.
  • The support provided for the most vulnerable pupils is a strength. Highly committed staff engage with a
    range of other agencies to ensure pupils and their families receive the support they need. As a result of
    this work and the robust yet caring approach, the number of exclusions and ‘sanction’ sessions has
    reduced significantly.
  • The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Its safeguarding procedures are clearly
    understood by all staff and regular training ensures this remains a high priority. Good site security and
    good maintenance ensure that the environment provided for pupils is safe and attractive.
  • Pupils say they feel safe at school and this view is shared by the staff and parents. Pupils understand the
    different forms bullying can take, but are clear that very little or no bullying happens. Pupils understand
    very well how to keep themselves safe when using the internet and on the roads. They enjoy and learn
    from the responsibilities they are given, which include such roles as class ambassadors, eco-councillors
    and school councillors.
  • The before-school and after-school clubs enhance learning for those who attend. These sessions, in a
    caring and secure setting, offer a range of activities enjoyed by the pupils.
The quality of teaching requires improvement
  • Teachers have not ensured that pupils make consistently good progress over time, or across a wide range
    of subjects. Lessons have not deepened knowledge or enabled pupils to develop their skills sufficiently
    well.
  • Over time, the teaching in subjects other than English and mathematics has not been good enough to
    enable pupils to make the progress they should, particularly the more-able pupils. Teachers do not always
    provide activities which challenge and motivate pupils in these subjects. Sometimes pupils are all given the
    same task, with no account being taken of the different ability of pupils, and consequently progress is held
    back for groups who find the task too easy or too hard.
  • Teachers do not routinely encourage pupils to apply the skills they were learning in literacy or
    mathematics in other subjects such as history, geography or science. Teachers’ marking in topic work
    does not direct pupils to correct errors in spelling or grammar. Marking is often only a tick or stamped as
    ‘target achieved’. Work in mathematics shows teachers’ expectations regarding pupils’ presentation to be
    too low, as poor number formation and untidy setting out continue over time.
  • Phonics (letters and their sounds) has not been systematically taught to Year 3 or Year 4 pupils and this
    has held back their progress in reading and writing. Since the beginning of term, phonics is being taught
    more effectively to these year groups.
  • Teachers’ marking of pupils’ work by teachers is not always helpful. Not all pupils are given clear enough
    guidance or feedback that would enable them to make faster progress. Even when marking is clear,
    teachers do not always ensure that pupils do the corrections or act on the advice. The new marking policy
    is helping to address this.
  • A majority of parents who responded to Parent View feel that their child does not get appropriate
    homework. The school has taken steps to improve this.
  • The assessment of pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics has improved since the
    introduction of a new system together with regular checking for accuracy of assessments. Meetings to
    discuss pupils’ progress that take place every three weeks, together with frequent reviews of pupils’ work,
    are ensuring that the progress of all pupils is being carefully checked by teachers and leaders.
  • Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to learning in their lessons. Teachers have good relationships with
    pupils and manage them well. Teachers use displays very effectively to support learning and to celebrate
    good work.
  • Pupils who are disabled or have special educational needs benefit from additional support which is closely
    matched to their individual needs. This enables them to take a full part in lessons and, together with extra
    help outside lessons, contributes to their good progress and demonstrates the school’s commitment to
    equality of opportunity.
  • Pupils are very positive about how they enjoy the teaching they receive, and this is supported by a large
    majority of parents. In a Year 5 lesson the pupils were enjoying planning their own adventure for the
    characters from
The Chronicles of Narnia

by CS Lewis.

  • Pupils receive effective support from teaching assistants, both in the classroom and when small groups are
    taken away from the classroom for focused work. This helps them to make good progress and build
    confidence in themselves as learners.
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
  • Pupils’ work shows that they do not acquire knowledge or understanding quickly and securely in a wide
    range of subjects, so they are not as well prepared for the next stage of their education as they should
    be.
  • Pupils do develop appropriate skills in reading, writing and mathematics, but do not apply them
    consistently well in other subjects. The progress made by pupils in these other subjects was judged to be
    below that expected because the work given to them was often too easy. The quality of work seen was
    often poor.
  • The proportion of pupils achieving Level 4 or above in 2013 was significantly below the national average
    for writing and mathematics, and at Level 5 results were significantly below the national average for
    reading, writing and mathematics. In 2014 the proportions of pupils attaining Level 4 and 5 increased for
    reading, writing and mathematics.
  • Pupils’ progress in 2013 was lower than the national average and significantly so in writing. In 2014 the
    progress made by pupils has improved considerably for pupils of all abilities. The proportion of pupils
    reaching the higher levels of attainment in reading, writing and mathematics also improved in 2014.
  • In the Year 6 national assessments in 2013, the attainment of disadvantaged pupils was one term behind
    other groups in the school in writing and nearly two terms behind in mathematics. Their attainment was
    two terms behind all pupils nationally in reading, and three terms behind in writing and mathematics.
  • In 2014 the attainment gap remained similar for reading and writing but was reduced in mathematics.
    The progress made by disadvantaged pupils at the end of Key Stage 2 improved in reading, writing and
    mathematics to be closer to that of other pupils in school.
  • The gap between the attainment of boys and girls that existed in 2013 for Level 4 reading and writing
    was closed in 2014. Boys’ achievement is now much closer to that of the girls in reading and writing.
  • The progress of the most able pupils in 2013 was below that expected, but this improved in 2014,
    particularly in reading and writing.
  • Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good progress because their needs
    are carefully assessed and monitored, and the pupils get the support they need to achieve well.
  • Current pupils’ work in their writing books shows that it is of a good standard across all year groups.

What inspection judgements mean

School

Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that
provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils
are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or
employment.
Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all
its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their
education, training or employment.
Grade 3 Requires
improvement
A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not
inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months
from the date of this inspection.
Grade 4 Inadequate A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s
leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have
the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This
school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires
significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to
be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by
Ofsted inspectors.

School details

Unique reference number 103913
Local authority Sandwell
Inspection number 442540

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
.

Type of school Junior
School category Community
Age range of pupils 7–11
Gender of pupils Mixed
Number of pupils on the school roll 240
Appropriate authority The governing body
Chair Lesley Turner
Headteacher Carla Clarke
Date of previous school inspection 4 October 2012
Telephone number 0121 556 0377
Fax number 0121 556 0630
Email address carla.clarke1@woodgreen-jun.sandwell.sch.uk

Save trees, print less.
Point taken, print!