Wodensborough Community Technology College

Wodensborough Community Technology College
Hydes Road
Wednesbury
West Midlands
WS100DR

Phone:0121 5064300
Headteacher: Mr Stephen Lanckham B.Ed. (Hons)

 

Schools nearby

  1. Wodensborough Pupil Referral Unit WS100DR (10 pupils)
  2. 0.3 miles Tameside Infant School WS100EX
  3. 0.3 miles Tameside Junior School WS100EX
  4. 0.3 miles Tameside Primary School WS100EZ (457 pupils)
  5. 0.4 miles Mesty Croft Primary School WS100QY (369 pupils)
  6. 0.4 miles Moorlands Primary School B712NZ (198 pupils)
  7. 0.4 miles Mesty Croft Primary School WS100QY (369 pupils)
  8. 0.5 miles Hall Green Primary School B712JQ (395 pupils)
  9. 0.5 miles Hall Green Junior School B712JQ
  10. 0.5 miles Hall Green Infant School B712JQ
  11. 0.6 miles The Bridge Centre (KS4 Unit) B712JN (41 pupils)
  12. 0.6 miles Joseph Edward Cox Junior School WS100JG
  13. 0.6 miles Joseph Edward Cox Infant School WS100JG
  14. 0.6 miles Manor Foundation Business, Enterprise & Sports College WS100JS (648 pupils)
  15. 0.6 miles Millfield School B712JN
  16. 0.6 miles The Priory Primary School WS100JG (234 pupils)
  17. 0.7 miles Park Hill Primary School WS100TJ (255 pupils)
  18. 0.7 miles St John Bosco Catholic Primary School B712ST (258 pupils)
  19. 0.7 miles St John's CofE Primary School WS107AL (178 pupils)
  20. 0.7 miles Menzies High School Science College B712BX (1505 pupils)
  21. 0.7 miles The Phoenix Collegiate B712BX (1826 pupils)
  22. 0.8 miles Kent Close Junior and Infant School B712SL (104 pupils)
  23. 0.9 miles Hateley Heath Junior School B712RP
  24. 0.9 miles Hateley Heath Infant School B712RP

Schools in Wednesbury
see also Rooms to Rent in Wednesbury

997 pupils, Mixed

515 boys
age
number
4a4b4c567891012131415
482 girls
age
number
4a4b4c5678910111314

Ofsted report


Wodensborough Community Technology College


Inspection report

Unique Reference Number104006
Local AuthoritySandwell
Inspection number336218
Inspection dates30 September 2009–1 October 2009
Reporting inspectorBrian Cartwright HMI


This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
Type of schoolComprehensive
School categoryCommunity
Age range of pupils11–16
Gender of pupilsMixed
Number of pupils on the school roll1081
Appropriate authorityThe governing body
ChairMr John Giles
HeadteacherMr Ken Ellis
Date of previous school inspection 16 May 2007
School addressHydes Road
Wednesbury, West Midlands
WS10 0DR
Telephone number0121 556 4951
Fax number0121 556 0134
Email addresswodensborough@yahoo.co.uk







Age group11–16
Inspection dates30 September 2009–1 October 2009
Inspection number336218



ofsted.gov.uk

© Crown copyright 2009



Introduction


This inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and four additional inspectors. The inspectors visited 33 lessons, and held meetings with governors, staff and groups of students. They observed the school's work, looked at recent examination results, governing body minutes and other records relating to safeguarding. Inspectors looked at 244 parental questionnaires.

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at the following:

    • the current standards of students work, in comparison to previous years
    • the relative achievement of boys compared to girls
    • the quality of teaching and learning, including day-to-day assessment.

Information about the school


The school serves an urban area within the 'Black Country' of the West Midlands. The proportion of students eligible for free school meals is higher than average. There is a significantly higher proportion of boys than girls. The school hosts specialist provision for students with hearing impairment, students with autistic spectrum disorders and complex communication difficulties, and students with specific learning difficulties. This accounts for the higher than average proportion of students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The school has been a specialist technology college for 16 years. It has maintained 'Investors in People' status, a National 'Gold' Healthy Schools award, and Artsmark and Sportsmark awards. The school has not offered sixth form provision for several years although remains designated as an 11-18 school.



Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

Inspection judgements


Overall effectiveness: how good is the school?

3


The school's capacity for sustained improvement

3


Main findings


Wodensbourough Community Technology College provides a sound education for all of its students. Its distinctive characteristic is the exceptionally high quality of care, guidance and support for students of all backgrounds and needs. The headteacher personifies the patience and dedication of all the staff as they continually seek better ways to raise standards and improve the life chances of students. Their efforts show in gradually improving attendance and an increasing number of academic indicators that meet or exceed national averages. The school now has a much lower than average number of serious disciplinary incidents, which is another indicator of the schools sound capacity for improvement. A very large majority of students say they feel safe in school, and their parents agree. All students, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, fully participate in all aspects of school life. This creates a very strong sense of community within the school, and leads the wider community by example. Students and staff from a wide range of different cultural and ethnic backgrounds work harmoniously together.

The long-established technology specialism has led to very strong science results. It has secured the use of information and communication technology by teachers and many students within and outside of lessons. There is a wide range of vocational opportunities linked to design and technology, for example the Edexcel National course in construction. As a result, the curriculum, particularly at Key Stage 4, is flexible and adapted well to student's needs and interests. However, there remains variability in the quality of teaching. Some teaching is outstanding, but in many lessons, teachers give the same task to every student irrespective of their prior knowledge or ability. Regular tests in different subjects ensure the school, parents and students have a broad picture of student progress towards end-of-year expectations. The day-to-day marking of work is variable in quality. Some examples give clear 'next steps' advice, but there are also some examples of perfunctory marking. It is rare to see evidence of students responding to the advice, for example, by doing corrections straight away. This inconsistency reflects some shortfalls in the impact of routine monitoring and evaluation of teaching.

About 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.


What does the school need to do to improve further?


  • Further raise the quality of teaching and learning by:
  • promptly improving the quality of day-to-day marking so that it consistently informs students what they should do to improve their work
    • expecting students to respond to that advice
    • planning lessons that consistently engage and challenge students with tasks matched to their ability and prior attainment
    • developing the role of middle managers in their response to evidence gained from routine monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning.

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils

3


The attainment of students when they enter the school in Year 7 is below average. All students make at least satisfactory progress through school. In the lessons seen by inspectors, students made at least adequate progress, with faster progress in lessons that directed tasks matched to students' abilities. Overall, however, academic standards by Year 11 are still lower than the national average in most subjects, with the exception of science. The curriculum provides a substantial number of vocational and work-based pathways leading to useful qualifications that have local currency. Some of these are not included in the overall academic performance data. At a subject level, boys are making satisfactory progress overall, with more able boys (who take 8 or more GCSE's) making good progress. Girls achieved well overall in 2008. The high proportion of students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities includes a high proportion of boys, some with complex needs, almost all of these students made at least satisfactory progress.

Students enjoy school, and feel safe. One student wrote that, 'People are so friendly and the teachers are too'. They are confident that staff will deal with isolated examples of harassment. A small minority of students and parents did not agree that behaviour was good. However, behaviour in almost all the lessons seen by inspectors was good, as it was at break and lunchtimes. Students' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The school works hard to develop these aspects through its personal, social and health education, its Citizenship programmes and through 'ethical studies' lessons and assemblies. Students experience cultural awareness projects such as 'Black History Month' and the Year 11 visit to Lourdes. The school explicitly seeks to counter prejudicial views that prevail in the wider community. Because of this provision and the school's high expectations of personal standards, students hold strong morals. They know the difference from right and wrong and students appreciate the values held by other races, cultures and beliefs.

About half the students regularly take part in a wide range of extra-curricular activities during the week. Although they know how to eat well, a small minority do not think the school helps them to be healthy; this is partly a consequence of a high proportion of students leaving the site at lunchtimes. Many students participate in community-wide schemes such as environmental protection and preparing advisory information regarding Internet safety for use by other schools.


These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Taking into account:
          Pupils' attainment¹
          The quality of pupils' learning and their progress
          The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress
3
4
3
3
The extent to which pupils feel safe2
Pupils' behaviour2
The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles3
The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community3
The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
Taking into account:
          Pupils' attendance¹
3
3
The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low


How effective is the provision?


During the inspection, the quality of lessons seen ranged from satisfactory to outstanding. Inspectors agree with the school that the overall quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. In most lessons, relationships are positive and behaviour is good, reinforcing the positive attitudes of students towards their learning. In the best lessons, exciting tasks motivated students to attempt challenging activities, even where some students had significant learning difficulties. For example, in an information and communication technology lesson, the teacher prepared different resources in order to interest and engage the widely differing abilities in the class. The expectation was for all students to develop a chart from a spreadsheet, the learning resources varied in line with the abilities of the individual student and as a result all students made good progress. In the satisfactory lessons the expectations of teachers are lower and planning is not refined sufficiently. As a result the pace is slower and students make less progress.

Teachers use regular assessments of the progress of students to provide support for those who underachieve. However, the quality of marking varies too much. At its best, detailed written feedback gives clear guidance on what students need to do to improve. In contrast, some marking is infrequent, with little comment to aid improvement and students are not expected to complete or improve sub-standard work.

The Key Stage 3 curriculum includes a high degree of support for individual literacy and numeracy alongside cross-subject projects and the development of thinking skills. This flexible and individually focussed approach continues at Key Stage 4. Extensive and imaginative partnerships with other agencies and providers further enhance the curriculum for older pupils. Many students therefore gain worthwhile vocational experience and qualifications whilst still at school. As a result, the proportion of Year 11 students who do not continue into education or employment with training has halved since the previous inspection. Students with specific learning needs are successfully included in lessons, because the specialist planning to meet those needs is effective.

The school knows each of its students very well, and is very successful in meeting their needs, however challenging some of those needs can be. A student felt much better about themselves since recently transferring into the school. The school goes the extra mile to compensate for the barriers to learning faced by many of its young people, with catch-up sessions, a tailored curriculum, and excellent partnerships with support agencies. Students with special educational needs or disabilities benefit from the good quality support provided by teaching assistants. The working ethos of the school is warm-hearted and welcoming, and is particularly so for vulnerable learners; their peers are very good at including such students into everyday school life. The school provides good quality information to parents and students about how well they are progressing towards challenging targets.


These are the grades for the quality of provision

The quality of teaching
Taking into account:
          The use of assessment to support learning
3
3
The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships2
The effectiveness of care, guidance and support1


How effective are leadership and management?


The school's primary motivation is about inclusion. From the governors through to administrative staff, everybody is committed to ensuring learners are given every opportunity to reach their potential irrespective of background and need. Senior leaders have made accurate evaluations of the school's main strengths and weaknesses, and developed adequate plans to raise standards further. The headteacher's commitment to equality of opportunity has also ensured a successful programme of staff development, including the training of new teachers and support staff. As a result, the school has been able to maintain a stable staff despite local difficulties in recruitment and retention. The school has maintained 'Investors in People' status and is rightly proud of this affirmation of the high quality training and development of staff.

Leadership and management of teaching and learning are satisfactory. Senior leaders in the school monitor accurately the quality of lessons and students' work. However, middle managers do not use the results of their own quality assurance activities to diagnose strengths and weaknesses to the same extent. As a result, priorities and strategies to improve the teaching within their own faculties are less clear.

Safeguarding procedures are effective, because the school is alert to the well-being of all learners, and expert in addressing any needs that arise. The school exceeds the minimum requirements for safe recruiting and vetting of adults working with children. Governors have an adequate understanding of school performance although have relatively few links with school managers on a day-to-day basis, other than at headteacher level. Nevertheless, the governors continue to drive successful partnerships with the local community and their vision underpins the effective work of the school in promoting community cohesion.


These are the grades for leadership and management

The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement
Taking into account:
          The leadership and management of teaching and learning
3
3
The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the
school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met
3
The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers3
The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being2
The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination2
The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures2
The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion2
The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money3


Views of parents and carers


The large majority of parents who returned the Ofsted questionnaire are happy with their child's experience at the school. During the first inspection day 168 questionnaires were recorded in detail and the analysis shown in the following table. A further 76 questionnaires were received on day 2. A very small minority of parents felt that the school did not deal with unacceptable behaviour, but inspection evidence shows that the school is effective at managing the rare instances of poor behaviour. A few parents also thought the school did not help their children to have a healthy lifestyle. A few parents mentioned their disapproval of the off-site arrangements for lunch. The school does provide cooked meals and sandwiches, and supervised spaces for children to eat packed lunches. The school also requires parents to give written approval for children to leave the site at lunchtime.



Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire


Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Wodensborough Community Technology College to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school.

In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 244 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 1081 pupils registered at the school.


StatementsStrongly
agree
AgreeDisagreeStrongly
disagree
Total%Total%Total%Total%
My child enjoys school36211096515953
The school keeps my child safe31181197112742
My school informs me about my child's progress321910462221342
My child is making enough progress at this school3219124743242
The teaching is good at this school31181217210632
The school helps me to support my child's learning301810864201253
The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle171012373191132
The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment)2716118709532
The school meets my child's particular needs2615125748521
The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour37229154251574
The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns19111146814853
The school is led and managed effectively2917120719542
Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school4527110657432

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.



Glossary


What inspection judgements mean


GradeJudgementDescription
Grade 1OutstandingThese features are highly effective. An oustanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.
Grade 2GoodThese are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.
Grade 3SatisfactoryThese features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.
Grade 4InadequateThese features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

Overall effectiveness of schools inspected between September 2007 and July 2008


Overall effectiveness judgement (percentage of schools)
Type of schoolOutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate
Nursery schools395830
Primary schools1350334
Secondary schools1740349
Sixth forms1843372
Special schools2654182
Pupil referral
units
755307
All schools1549325

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously.

The data in the table above were reported in the Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills 2007/08.

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures include those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.



Common terminology used by inspectors


Achievement:

the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

Attainment:

the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

Capacity to improve:

the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

Leadership and management:

the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

Learning:

how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

Overall effectiveness:

inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

  • The school's capacity for sustained improvement.
  • Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.
  • The quality of teaching.
  • The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs,  including, where relevant, through partnerships.
  • The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
Progress:

the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.



This letter is provided for the school, parents and
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's
main findings from the inspection of their school.


2 October 2009

Dear Students

Inspection of Wodensborough Community Technology College, Wednesbury, WS10 0DR

Thank you for your warm and friendly welcome to my inspection team and myself during our recent visit to your school. The most impressive feature of your school is the outstanding level of care you receive, and you as students play a crucial part in looking after each other. It means nobody is left out of classroom and social activity, and explains why almost all of you enjoy school so much. The school does take account of your views, and gives you an important role in the wider community.

Wodensborough is giving you a satisfactory education overall. Almost every student makes the academic progress we expect, given the variety of different talents and abilities you each have. The curriculum is very varied, and allows you to choose a wide range of courses including good vocational pathways. Your performance in science is particularly strong. The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory, with many examples of outstanding practice. At its best, teachers set you tasks that match your individual abilities well, yet demand all of your attention. Teachers are always willing to help you, and we agree with you that the working relationships between staff and students are enjoyable, good humoured and supportive.

The school checks your academic progress regularly, and will help you if you fall behind. We think that your progress would further improve if the school made better use of how it monitors the quality of teaching to further improve your lessons so that from the start you are all set challenging tasks that take account of your different abilities and knowledge. The majority of the time, your work is marked to praise your efforts. When teachers identify errors and make suggestions on how to improve your work we have asked them to make sure that you do the corrections or repeat the work to a higher standard.

Best wishes for your future

Yours faithfully

Brian Cartwright

Her Majesty's Inspector



Any complaints about the inspection or the report should be made following the procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: ofsted.gov.uk. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 08456 404045, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.