School etc

St Mary's Priory RC Junior School

St Mary's Priory RC Junior School
Hermitage Road

phone: 020 88009305

headteacher: Mrs F Collins

school holidays: via Haringey council

237 pupils aged 7—10y mixed gender
240 pupils capacity: 99% full

115 boys 49%


120 girls 51%


Last updated: Oct. 2, 2014

Primary — Voluntary Aided School

Education phase
Religious character
Roman Catholic
Establishment type
Voluntary Aided School
Establishment #
OSGB coordinates
Easting: 532704, Northing: 188523
GPS coordinates
Latitude: 51.58, Longitude: -0.086208
Accepting pupils
7—11 years old
Census date
Jan. 16, 2014
Ofsted last inspection
Sept. 24, 2014
Archdiocese of Westminster
Region › Const. › Ward
London › Tottenham › St Ann's
Urban > 10k - less sparse
Free school meals %

rooms to rent in Haringey

Schools nearby

  1. St Mary's Priory RC Infant School N155RE (220 pupils)
  2. 0.1 miles St Ann's CofE Primary School N155JG
  3. 0.1 miles Amina Hatun Islamic School At the Annexe N155RG
  4. 0.1 miles Islamic Shakhsiyah Foundation N155RG (119 pupils)
  5. 0.1 miles St Ann's CofE Primary School N155JG (237 pupils)
  6. 0.2 miles Tiverton Primary School N156SP (450 pupils)
  7. 0.3 miles Seven Sisters Junior School N155QE
  8. 0.3 miles Seven Sisters Infant School N155QE
  9. 0.3 miles Stamford Hill Primary School N156HD (227 pupils)
  10. 0.3 miles Woodlands Park Junior School N153TD
  11. 0.3 miles Woodlands Park Infant School N153TD
  12. 0.3 miles Seven Sisters Primary School N155QE (493 pupils)
  13. 0.3 miles Chestnuts Primary School N153AS (408 pupils)
  14. 0.4 miles Bnois Jerusalem Girls School N165DL (697 pupils)
  15. 0.4 miles Mechinah Liyeshivah Zichron Moshe N165AR
  16. 0.4 miles Woodlands Park Nursery School and Childrens Centre N153SD (122 pupils)
  17. 0.4 miles Getters Talmud Torah N165AR (238 pupils)
  18. 0.5 miles Woodberry Down Community Primary School N41SY (497 pupils)
  19. 0.5 miles Woodberry Down Community Primary School N41SY
  20. 0.5 miles Beis Rochel d'Satmar Girls' School N165DL (1439 pupils)
  21. 0.5 miles Downhills Junior School N154AB
  22. 0.5 miles Downhills Infant School N154AB
  23. 0.5 miles West Green Primary School N153RT (246 pupils)
  24. 0.5 miles The Langham School N153RB

List of schools in Haringey

School report

St Mary’s Priory Catholic Junior


Hermitage Road, London, N15 5RE

Inspection dates 24–25 September 2014
Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2
Previous inspection: Good 2
Leadership and management Good 2
Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2
Quality of teaching Good 2
Achievement of pupils Good 2

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Information about this inspection

All groups of pupils make good progress. By the
Teaching is typically good. Pupils are encouraged
Pupils’ behaviour is good in lessons. Their positive
This is a warm, welcoming and caring school
end of Year 6, attainment in reading, writing and
mathematics is above average.
to learn collaboratively, which contributes to their
attitudes contribute well towards their progress.
Pupils feel safe and have confidence in all the
which pupils are proud of and enjoy attending.
This is reflected in their above average
The school successfully promotes pupils’ spiritual,
The range of subjects and activities makes a good
School leaders, in partnership with the governing
Governors have a good understanding of the
moral, social and cultural development. This is seen
in the way pupils respect and value their diverse
contribution to pupils’ understanding about British
values and is preparing them well for life in modern
body, have strengthened teaching and assessment
and, as a result, have raised pupils’ achievement.
school’s strengths and weaknesses. They continue
to focus on helping the school to improve further.
Progress slows in Years 3 and 4 because the work
does not always challenge most-able pupils.
Opportunities to extend writing skills in subjects
other than English are limited.
Pupils are not always confident at spelling key
  • Inspectors observed 12 parts of lessons and all teachers were seen, some jointly with the headteacher,
    deputy headteacher and the phase leader.
  • Inspectors observed lunch time and break times and attended an assembly.
  • Inspectors heard some pupils from Years 3 and 6 reading.
  • Discussions were held with pupils, key staff, a representative from the local authority and two members of
    the governing body.
  • Inspectors looked at a range of documents, including the school’s own evaluation of its performance,
    plans for improvement, governing body minutes, a range of pupils’ work in all of the year groups, records
    of pupils’ behaviour and attendance, and information relating to safeguarding.
  • Inspectors considered the 19 responses to the questionnaires completed by staff.
  • Inspectors took account of the recent questionnaires to parents and the few written responses from
    parents. Inspectors spoke to parents at the start of the school day. There were not enough responses to
    the online survey, Parent View.
    Inspection team
Sharona Semlali, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
Mathew Kleiner-Mann Additional Inspector

Full report

Information about this school

  • This is an average-sized junior school. It is part of a hard federation with the infants’ school which is
    situated on the same site.
  • The infant school was inspected at the same time as the junior school.
  • The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported by school
    action is slightly below the national average. The proportion of pupils supported by school action plus or
    with a statement of special educational needs is also slightly below average.
  • The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium (which provides additional funding to support
    pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children in local authority care) is well above
  • The proportion of pupils who come from minority ethnic groups and those that have English as an
    additional language is well above average. The two main groups are from Poland and Africa. The
    proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is also well above average.
  • The school meets the current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’
    attainment and progress.
  • The school runs its own breakfast and after school clubs providing provision from 8.00am until 6.00pm.
  • The school provides a nurture group called the Kingfisher suite.
  • The headteacher is a Local Leader of Education. She supports three schools: St Monica’s Primary School;
    St Paul’s Primary School; and St Thomas of Canterbury.
  • Since the previous inspection there has been some staff turbulence in Years 3 and 4.

What does the school need to do to improve further?

  • Make teaching typically outstanding to accelerate progress in Years 3 and 4 by:
    ensuring that the work is hard enough, particularly for the most-able pupils
    extending pupils’ writing skills by getting pupils to write at length in subjects other than English
    ensuring that pupils are confident and accurately spell any key words.

Inspection judgements

The leadership and management are good
  • The headteacher, alongside the senior leadership team, has worked tirelessly to address all weaknesses in
    teaching over the past year. This has been successful. They have addressed the issues from the previous
    inspection. As a result, the quality of teaching has improved and is now good and pupils are achieving
  • Senior leaders have developed robust systems for checking the quality of teaching, which is shared with
    governors. Middle leaders are actively involved in this process. The information is used well to provide
    teachers with the specific training and support required. Teachers have clear and challenging targets that
    are reviewed regularly. Stringent support is put in place for them whenever it is needed. This is helping to
    raise achievement.
  • The middle leaders have a good understanding on how to use data to evaluate pupils’ progress. Those
    that are new to their roles are quickly brought up to speed by working alongside more established leaders.
  • All leaders have a clear understanding of the need to prevent discrimination. Equality and diversity are
    promoted well. This is evident in the way pupils from different backgrounds and cultures learn and achieve
    well together. The school has an international day every year that celebrates the different cultures within
    the school. Good links are established with the local places of worship. This is contributing well to pupils’
    spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
  • The curriculum is currently being developed. It is relevant to the local community and represents modern
    British values. For example, the school had a week of ‘proud being British’. Pupils enjoyed dressing up for
    this occasion. This is having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement. However, the curriculum does not
    always provide enough challenge in Years 3 and 4, particularly for the most-able pupils.
  • The primary school sport funding is used well to improve teachers’ skills to deliver high quality lessons
    through using the expertise of trained coaches. Pupils are developing better lifestyles as extra-curricular
    activities are offered, such as a running club at lunchtime and tennis. All of this is helping pupils to
    develop a healthier lifestyle.
  • The local authority provides only limited support to this good school.
  • The school has established good partnerships with parents. They say that the leaders are approachable
    and do well in helping their child to learn.
  • Safeguarding arrangements meet requirements.
  • The governance of the school:
    The governing body is stable, experienced and effective. Its members make good use of each other’s
    skills to determine which committee they will belong to. Governors have regular training which helps
    them to carry out their duties effectively. From their regular visits and scrutiny of data, they are fully
    aware of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Also, governors know the views of parents by talking
    to them. Governors meet regularly with pupils. This forum is known as ‘Have Your Say’. The governors
    are able to use this information to hold leaders to account.
    Governors have worked closely with the headteacher and acted quickly to address any weaknesses in
    the quality of teaching. The management of the headteacher’s performance is firmly in place. Governors
    are fully informed of the teachers’ effectiveness in raising standards. They know how it links to their pay
    progression as they have the final say in the decision.

Governors have a good understanding of how the additional pupil premium funding is closing the gaps

in attainment and how the sport funding is improving their pupils’ physical well-being. They ensure that

the school promotes respect and tolerance through the curriculum and they utilise the different links

with the local community.

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
  • The behaviour of pupils is good. This is also the view of parents, pupils and staff. Pupils are polite,
    courteous and very friendly. They know how to welcome visitors into their school. They conduct
    themselves well around the school. The atmosphere in the dining hall at lunchtimes is calm. All pupils
    wear the correct uniforms and the learning environment is free from litter. In the playground, pupils play
    well together, regardless of their nationality, race and gender.
  • In the classrooms, pupils cooperate and learn together well in pairs and in small groups. They have good
    attitudes to learning and show plenty of respect to each other at all times. Behaviour is not yet
    outstanding as, on the odd times, where the lesson does not fully involve them, their concentration
  • Pupils have a good understanding of the school’s rewards and sanctions. They respond well to them. At
    the time of the inspection pupils were eager to gain the ‘best I can do’ tokens.
  • The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils have a good understanding of the
    different types of bullying, including cyberbullying. They know how to keep themselves safe, particularly
    when using the internet. Pupils say that there was bullying in the school, but feel strongly that this has
    been addressed and there is no bullying now. They are confident that staff will sort out any problems.
  • The rigorous and robust systems that leaders have in place have drastically improved attendance. It is
    well above average.
  • Pupils enjoy going to breakfast club. It enables them to socialise with their friends and gives them a
    settled start to the day.
The quality of teaching is good
  • School leaders have worked hard to address previous issues in teaching in Years 3 and 4. Matters have
    greatly improved over the year and teaching is now good. As a result, pupils are making better progress.
  • Mathematics is taught effectively, and in other subjects. For example, work in pupils’ books shows that
    pupils are given time to investigate temperature, different types of graphs and the use of Venn diagrams
    in other subjects, such as science and geography. Pupils do well in mathematics because real life and
    meaningful situations are used.
  • Reading is taught well throughout the school and pupils have good opportunities to read in subjects other
    than in English. Teachers skilfully use a range of questioning techniques and activities to develop pupils’
    understanding of the text. For example, in a Year 3 class the different types of questions and group work
    helped pupils to have a good understanding of how to empathise with the characters’ thoughts and feeling
    from the class novel.
  • Teaching assistants work closely with teachers. They provide effective support to individuals and groups,
    particularly for those who need it. They provide useful resources to support pupils’ learning.
  • Good routines, strong relationships and interesting topics help pupils who attend the Kingfisher suite to
    make good progress.
  • In lessons, teachers effectively develop pupils’ speaking and listening skills. For example, in a Year 5 class,
    pupils confidently articulated their opinion about where the dark photograph took place. Pupils are
    encouraged to debate, and do so in a mature way. As a result, pupils have good speaking and listening
  • Pupils’ work is marked well. This has greatly improved over the last year. Pupils have designated time to
    respond and act on the advice provided by their teachers. This helps them to learn quickly from their
  • Teachers make good use of a variety of interesting resources and the class novel to stimulate pupils’ ideas
    to develop their writing skills. For example, pupils in a Year 3 class were thoroughly focused and engaged
    in making a gruesome medicine for one of the characters from their class novel. They produced some high
    quality writing. However, pupils are not challenged to write at length in different subjects. Sometimes,
    pupils do always not spell key words correctly and this is not always addressed.
The achievement of pupils is good
  • Pupils start Year 3 with standards of attainment that are broadly average. Since the previous inspection,
    staff turbulence in Years 3 and 4 has slowed pupils’ progress. However, in Years 5 and 6, pupils’ progress
    is accelerated so that pupils quickly make up for any lost ground. By the time they leave at the end of
    Year 6, attainment is above average and pupils are well prepared for their next stage in education.
  • Reading is promoted well in lessons and in other subjects. As a result, pupils have good comprehension
    skills and enjoy reading for pleasure. Pupils who can read books in other languages do so frequently and
    are proud of this. Those who are at the early stages of reading have good strategies to work out
    unfamiliar words.
  • In mathematics, pupils are good at working out their calculations mentally. Pupils say they enjoy
    mathematics. Their presentation in mathematics is good.
  • School leaders are effectively making a difference to the disadvantaged pupils. Currently, in the different
    year groups, the achievement gap between the disadvantaged pupils and the others has virtually closed or
    is rapidly closing. Results in the end of Key Stage 2 National Assessment Tests in 2013 show that the
    disadvantaged pupils are just less than a term behind in mathematics and writing, and just over a term in
    reading when compared to their classmates. When comparing the results of the disadvantaged pupils to
    other pupils nationally, the gap is also narrow. The disadvantaged pupils are a term behind in reading, just
    over a term behind in writing and just under a term behind in mathematics.
  • Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good progress. This is because they
    are well supported and catered for in class; this is also the case for those who attend the Kingfisher suite.
  • Pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language achieve
    well. They often do better than the others in the school, as well as other pupils nationally. This is because
    school leaders provide good support for the parents so that they are better equipped to support their
  • Pupils’ handwriting is neatly presented. Pupils legibly join their letters together and take pride when using
    a pen to write with.
  • The most-able pupils achieve similarly to their peers nationally in reading, writing and mathematics.
    However, they could do even better if the work was hard enough to extend their thinking skills in Years 3
    and 4.

What inspection judgements mean


Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that
provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils
are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or
Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all
its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their
education, training or employment.
Grade 3 Requires
A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not
inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months
from the date of this inspection.
Grade 4 Inadequate A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s
leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have
the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This
school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires
significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to
be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by
Ofsted inspectors.

School details

Unique reference number 102145
Local authority Haringey
Inspection number 448180

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

Type of school Junior
School category Voluntary aided
Age range of pupils 7–11
Gender of pupils Mixed
Number of pupils on the school roll 236
Appropriate authority The governing body
Chair Marva Hibbet
Headteacher Florence Collins
Date of previous school inspection 16–17 March 2010
Telephone number 020 88009305
Fax number 020 88801142
Email address reveal email: adm…

print / save trees, print less