School etc

St Clare's Catholic Primary School

St Clare's Catholic Primary School
Robert Road
West Midlands

phone: 0121 5543289

headteacher: Mrs Victoria Rivett

school holidays: via Birmingham council

424 pupils aged 2—10y mixed gender
420 pupils capacity: 101% full

210 boys 50%

≤ 274a74b94c165y306y277y318y179y2510y22

215 girls 51%

≤ 244a74b64c165y296y327y188y339y3110y29

Last updated: Sept. 17, 2014

Primary — Voluntary Aided School

Education phase
Religious character
Roman Catholic
Establishment type
Voluntary Aided School
Establishment #
OSGB coordinates
Easting: 405989, Northing: 290247
GPS coordinates
Latitude: 52.51, Longitude: -1.9132
Accepting pupils
3—11 years old
Census date
Jan. 16, 2014
Ofsted last inspection
May 14, 2014
Archdiocese of Birmingham
Region › Const. › Ward
West Midlands › Birmingham, Perry Barr › Lozells and East Handsworth
Urban > 10k - less sparse
Free school meals %

rooms to rent in Birmingham

Schools nearby

  1. 0.2 miles Westminster Primary School B203PN (464 pupils)
  2. 0.3 miles Westminster Junior School B203LJ
  3. 0.3 miles Westminster Infant School B203LJ
  4. 0.3 miles Heathfield Primary School B191HJ (461 pupils)
  5. 0.3 miles St Mary's CofE Junior and Infant School (NC) B202RW
  6. 0.3 miles St Marys C of E Primary and Nursery, Academy, Handsworth B202RW (354 pupils)
  7. 0.4 miles Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School B203LP
  8. 0.4 miles Mayfield School B191HJ (249 pupils)
  9. 0.4 miles Institute of Higher Excellence B203LL
  10. 0.4 miles Holy Trinity CE Primary Academy (Handsworth) B203LP (230 pupils)
  11. 0.5 miles Welford Primary School B202BL (481 pupils)
  12. 0.5 miles Sacred Heart Catholic School B203AE (207 pupils)
  13. 0.5 miles Astwell Preparatory School B202QR
  14. 0.6 miles Canterbury Cross Primary School B203AA (495 pupils)
  15. 0.6 miles Birchfield Community School B66AJ (749 pupils)
  16. 0.6 miles St Teresa's Catholic Primary School B202NY (209 pupils)
  17. 0.6 miles Diamond Academy
  18. 0.7 miles Anglesey Infant School B191RA
  19. 0.7 miles Handsworth Wood Boys' School B202HH
  20. 0.7 miles Handsworth Wood Girls' School B202HL
  21. 0.7 miles King Edward VI Handsworth School B219AR
  22. 0.7 miles Anglesey Primary School B191RA (759 pupils)
  23. 0.7 miles King Edward VI Handsworth School B219AR (903 pupils)
  24. 0.7 miles Handsworth Wood Girls' Academy B202HL (811 pupils)

List of schools in Birmingham

School Report

St Clare’s Catholic Primary


Robert Road, Handsworth, Birmingham, B20 3RT

Inspection dates 14–15 May 2014
Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3
Achievement of pupils Good 2
Quality of teaching Good 2
Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2
Leadership and management Good 2

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.
It is not yet an outstanding school because

The headteacher is driving school
Pupils of all abilities and from all backgrounds
Standards are improving and are close to
Teaching is good across the school. Staff
improvement very well. She has a clear view
of the strengths and weaknesses in what the
school provides for its pupils. This is ensuring
a strong focus on improving achievement.
make good overall progress from their
different starting points.
national averages when the pupils leave the
school. Pupils make especially good progress
in mathematics.
have good working relationships with the
pupils. They praise the efforts pupils make to
improve their work.
Behaviour in and around the school is good.
Pupils have a good understanding of how to
Senior staff and phase leaders (for different
Leaders and staff work well together as a
Governance is good. Governors are supportive,
Pupils from different ethnic groups get on well
keep themselves and others safe.
age groups) carefully check pupils’ progress
and use this information to identify what
additional support pupils may need.
team, with many proudly noting the recent
improvement in many areas.
understand data on pupils’ performance and
hold the school to account for the standards
The progress pupils make in English is not as
strong as in mathematics. This is because
their speaking, reading and writing skills are
not always secure.
Teachers do not always plan enough activities
Teaching assistants are not always effective
that challenge all pupils, or make sure marking
helps them to improve their work.
enough in supporting pupils in their work.

Information about this inspection

  • Inspectors observed learning in part of 26 lessons. Some of these were joint lesson observations
    with the headteacher or deputy headteacher.
  • Meetings were held with the headteacher, the Early Years Foundation Stage leader, the special
    educational needs coordinator and phase leaders (those leading year group teams). Discussions
    also took place with groups of pupils, members of the governing body and a representative of
    the local authority.
  • There were not enough responses to take account of from the online questionnaire for parents
    (Parent View). However, inspectors spoke to several parents and carers at the start of both days
    of the inspection. Inspectors also reviewed the 42 responses to the staff questionnaire.
  • Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a number of documents, including data on
    pupils’ progress and planning, and monitoring information. Inspectors listened to several pupils
    reading and they scrutinised samples of recent work. They also considered in detail records
    relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.

Inspection team

Sue Hall, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
Clive Lewis Additional Inspector
Linda Brown Additional Inspector

Full report

Information about this school

  • This is a larger-than-average-sized primary school.
  • Around 97% of the pupils are from minority ethnic groups, which is well above the national
    average. More than 70% of the pupils speak English as an additional language.
  • The school has a 52-place nursery.
  • A very high number of pupils join or leave partway through their primary school education. A
    large proportion change schools between Nursery and Year 6.
  • Around 48% of pupils are eligible for the pupil premium, which is well above the national
    average. In this school, the pupil premium provides additional funding for those who are known
    to be eligible for free school meals and a very small number who are looked after by the local
    authority. The latter group is not referred to in the report in order to avoid identifying
    individuals. Several other families are awaiting confirmation of their immigration status and their
    eligibility for free school meals.
  • The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs identified at
    school action is below the national average. The proportion supported at school action plus or
    with a statement of special educational needs is above the national average.
  • At the time of the last inspection, an executive headteacher and head of school had just taken
    up their temporary roles. The head of school was appointed as acting headteacher in September
    2013 and headteacher in February 2014.
  • The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectation
    for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics.

What does the school need to do to improve further?

  • Further raise achievement in English by:
    providing more opportunities for pupils to practise and develop their speaking skills throughout
    the school and in a range of subjects
    helping pupils to develop a greater enjoyment and confidence in their reading skills by
    developing the ability to work out unfamiliar words
    enabling pupils to spell accurately, write grammatically and use correct punctuation.
  • Improve teaching and learning by:
    making sure that all staff provide work that challenges pupils of different abilities, and
    especially the more able
    checking that the marking of pupils’ work identifies clearly what they need to improve and that
    pupils have understood and acted on teachers’ comments
    making sure that teaching assistants are actively involved in checking pupils’ work and
    providing support.

Inspection judgements

The achievement of pupils is good
  • Children join the Early Years Foundation Stage or other year groups with skills and experiences
    that are well below what is typical for their different ages. Throughout the school, several pupils
    are new to the country or new to learning English. Most adapt well to their surroundings and
    make good, and sometimes very rapid, progress from their different starting points.
  • Children in the Nursery made good progress when learning to use speech bubbles to record
    what pirates might say when discovering treasure. Those in Reception also found out how
    pirates see ships far away by investigating how to use telescopes.
  • Checks at the end of Year 1 of pupils’ understanding of letters and the sounds they make
    (phonics) show their skills are well below average. Staff have recently improved the way they
    teach these skills in order to help pupils develop a more secure understanding of how to work
    out new words.
  • Tests in Year 2 indicate that standards have been well below average for some time. Data in
    Year 6 show that, while standards have been a little below national averages, pupils of all
    abilities and from all backgrounds now make good progress. Recent assessment information
    indicates that pupils are set to do better than previously in this year’s end-of-key-stage tests.
  • Pupils do particularly well in mathematics and have done so for some time. Standards in Year 6
    are in line with national averages and this represents considerable progress over the course of
    Key Stage 2. Most pupils have a secure understanding of numbers and how to calculate, but are
    not always quite as confident when explaining what they are doing.
  • Pupils’ skills in English are not as good as those in mathematics. Many initially have little grasp of
    English, lack confidence in their skills or do not speak in grammatically correct sentences. They
    often make rapid progress but their lack of confidence in speaking affects their learning.
  • Pupils’ reading skills are initially below average. The school has introduced a new reading
    scheme to interest the pupils and help develop reading in a systematic manner. Pupils are now
    making good progress in reading, although few show a love of books. Pupils’ skills in writing are
    also below average but improving. This is because pupils’ spelling, grammar and punctuation
    skills are not yet consistently good across the school. The sample of recent work in Year 6,
    however, shows some high-quality writing, including that in pupils’ ‘theme’ books.
  • Data indicate that previously boys did not do as well as girls, and to a greater degree than seen
    nationally. The school now regularly checks and tracks the progress of all groups of pupils and
    provides well-targeted support. This includes effective booster work by teaching staff, including
    extra reading and writing tasks which is helping ensure there are no significant difference in the
    progress made by different groups of pupils.
  • Pupils eligible for support through pupil premium funding make good progress. In Year 6 in
    2013, they were two terms behind their classmates in mathematics and almost a year behind in
    reading and writing.
  • Additional sports funding is making a positive impact on standards, including in gymnastics.
  • Less-able pupils, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good
    progress because work is well matched to their specific learning needs and they receive effective
    additional support. This includes the work of the learning mentor and a ‘City Year’ mentoring
    programme by local young people, which includes a focus on Black African and Caribbean boys.
    More-able pupils are also given additional support but as yet do not always achieve all they can.
    Overall, the gaps between the attainment and progress made by different groups of pupils are
    closing at a good rate.
The quality of teaching is good
  • The school has developed a strong focus on improving teaching and learning. Lesson
    observations, assessments of pupils’ progress and performance and samples of their work over
    the course of the past year indicate that teaching is now typically good, particularly in Year 6.
  • Teachers have good subject knowledge and know how to teach pupils of different ages and
    abilities well. This was seen in a lesson in Year 6 where pupils were challenged to identify the
    features of the artist Keith Haring, which they did in an animated and knowledgeable manner.
    They then acted as a critic of their previous designs when working in this style prior to producing
    larger-sized versions of their work. In another Year 6 lesson, pupils planned a mystery story and
    made outstanding progress after identifying what to improve.
  • The school has considerably extended its support for different groups of pupils, including those
    at the early stages of learning English, to ensure that they are able to reach their potential.
    Booster groups are supported through the work of additional teachers and the deputy
    headteacher. This well-focused work is helping to close the gaps between different groups of
    pupils. Good use of the pupil premium is making a positive impact on learning. This includes the
    appointment of new teaching assistants and a project to promote imaginative play and the
    development of communication skills of the younger children.
  • Consistently good management of pupils ensures that lessons are conducted in a calm and
    purposeful manner. Staff have close working relationships with pupils and value their efforts.
    This helps raise pupils’ confidence and self-esteem which improves their learning.
  • Good teaching of children in the Early Years Foundation Stage helps them settle quickly. Staff
    ensure outdoor activities are linked to themes such as Pirates to help develop imagination and
    communication skills. For example, because the children were interested in searching for hidden
    treasure in the sand pit, they cooperated well and this increased their confidence in speaking.
  • The planning of lessons is generally good and takes account of the range of ability in the class.
    However, some examples of recent work show that pupils of all abilities sometimes focus on the
    same or very similar tasks, which do not always stretch and challenge the most able.
  • Staff mark pupils’ work conscientiously but do not always make clear exactly what they need to
    do to improve it. Sometimes marking is not revisited to see if pupils have addressed what they
    needed to do and whether they learn from their mistakes.
  • The work of teaching assistants is generally good and some is very effective, including that in
    the Nursery. In other lessons, support staff are less involved in checking pupils’ work and
    helping to move their learning forwards.
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
  • The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils say they like coming to school. Observations and
    discussions indicate that they typically behave well in a range of activities.
  • Pupils from different ethnic groups get on well together. Most are usually polite to each other
    and to the adults around them. They enjoy working with a partner and in a small group. When
    older pupils discuss and assess the work of their classmates, they do this in a quite mature
  • Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good. Pupils usually try hard with their work, as seen in the neat
    presentation in older pupils’ books. Many are willing to take part in discussions and offer their
    ideas, especially in Year 6. However, a few in most year groups offer little and wait for others to
    contribute their ideas. This does not help them develop the confidence to speak to others, or to
    use a wider and more descriptive vocabulary.
  • Attendance is close to the national average and has improved. It is now carefully checked and
    the school works with families with low attendance to increase this.
  • The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils know that bullying is more than
    one incident and can explain the different types that could occur, including cyber-bullying and
    physical or emotional bullying. Pupils can explain in detail the possible dangers of using the
    internet and mobile phones. They understand what to do in case of an emergency from
    discussions about the work of the emergency services. Pupils are confident that teaching staff
    and mentors respond to any worries they may have.
  • All of the parents spoken to believe that their children are kept safe and they have few concerns
    about pupils’ behaviour.
The leadership and management are good
  • The leadership of the headteacher is very effective and has been a pivotal reason why the
    school has moved forward so much recently.
  • Staff work well together as a team and some proudly commented, ‘We are now forward looking,
    determined and progressive.’ The headteacher is well supported by the deputy headteacher and
    phase leaders, all of whom recognise the impact of the many improvements made. The
    development of this leadership team has extended the number of staff involved in reviewing
    performance and developing learning in an effective manner.
  • Discussions with senior staff and phase leaders show that everyone is now much more
    accountable for the progress pupils make over their time at the school. Throughout the school,
    there are regular checks of what the pupils know, understand and can do. This information is
    used well to identify where additional support is needed, including for disabled pupils and those
    who have special educational needs.
  • These regular checks of pupils’ progress and the much better use of this information to track
    performance or identify underachievement have been key to the many improvements made.
    Pupil premium funding is used well to provide additional activities and extra staffing to enhance
    eligible pupils’ confidence and skills in a range of subjects.
  • The school now uses effective procedures to accurately check the quality of teaching and
    learning. Staff performance is managed well and linked appropriately to pay awards. Monitoring
    activities lead to additional training activities, including with other schools. This was seen in the
    use of the primary school sport funding, where a few staff indicated a lack of confidence in
    teaching gymnastics. The coaching by specialist staff from another school is making a positive
    impact in boosting staff confidence and pupils’ skills.
  • While few parents responded to the inspection questionnaire, many of those spoken to noted
    with pleasure the recent improvements and thought that their children were happy and doing
    well in school.
  • The school provides a good range of activities and visits to promote learning in all subjects.
    Pupils’ work in their ‘theme’ books helps to provide a good range of reasons to write or solve
    problems. The pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well. There
    are many opportunities for pupils to work together to develop their social skills, reflected in the
    mature discussions between some of the older pupils. Pupils enjoy celebrating festivals such as
    the May Procession, which promoted reflection and spiritual awareness.
  • The school works well with the local authority, which provides effective support for what it
    rightly judges to be an improving school. Staff also work with a group of local Catholic schools
    and join together in staff training activities. The school is involved in several local initiatives,
    including the local ‘City Year’ project which includes the mentoring of vulnerable pupils. This is
    having a positive impact on helping some pupils develop more positive attitudes to their
  • Procedures to safeguard pupils meet current national requirements. Staff ensure that pupils have
    equal access to activities by providing additional support when it is most needed. This includes
    when pupils arrive in school and especially for those new to learning English. The school fosters
    positive relationships and tackles discrimination. With the many improvements made and the
    development of a stronger leadership team, the school demonstrates that it has the capacity to
    improve further.
  • The governance of the school:
    Governance is good and has improved since the previous inspection. Governors are now not
    only supportive but also much better informed of what happens in school. As a result, they are
    in a stronger position to hold leaders to account for the quality of education provided.
    Governors have a growing understanding of what performance data tell them about the
    progress pupils are making, and recognise that additional training will help them develop this
    understanding even further. The curriculum committee and links with year groups ensure that
    several governors have a good understanding of pupils’ achievement.
    The governors ensure that additional funding for primary school sport and to support those
    eligible for the pupil premium is used appropriately to boost achievement.
    Governors are well informed about the quality of teaching and learning. They support the
    headteacher in managing teachers’ performance and pay-related issues. Governors are keen
    to develop their role further, and with recent appointments and considerable enthusiasm
    evident they are well placed to be able to do so.

What inspection judgements mean


Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes
that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures
that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their
education, training or employment.
Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well
for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage
of their education, training or employment.
Grade 3 Requires
A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it
is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within
24 months from the date of this inspection.
Grade 4 Inadequate A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and
the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not
demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary
improvement in the school. This school will receive regular
monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and
requires significant improvement but leadership and management
are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular
monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

School details

Unique reference number 103476
Local authority Birmingham
Inspection number 442528

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

Type of school Primary
School category Voluntary aided
Age range of pupils 3–11
Gender of pupils Mixed
Number of pupils on the school roll 426
Appropriate authority The governing body
Chair Barbara McPhillips
Headteacher Victoria Rivett
Date of previous school inspection 20 September 2012
Telephone number 0121 554 3289
Fax number 0121 523 5854
Email address reveal email: enqu…


print / save trees, print less