School etc

Sprowston Community High School

Kett Sixth Form College Sixth Form Centre Link

Sprowston Community High School
Cannerby Lane

phone: 01603 485266

headteacher: Mr Andrew John B.Sc(Hons) Ma

reveal email: h…


school holidays: via Norfolk council

1521 pupils aged 11—18y mixed gender
1767 pupils capacity: 86% full

760 boys 50%


760 girls 50%


Last updated: June 20, 2014

Secondary — Community School

Education phase
Establishment type
Community School
Establishment #
OSGB coordinates
Easting: 624956, Northing: 311177
GPS coordinates
Latitude: 52.652, Longitude: 1.3243
Accepting pupils
11—18 years old
Census date
Jan. 16, 2014
Ofsted last inspection
March 20, 2013
Region › Const. › Ward
East of England › Norwich North › Sprowston East
Urban > 10k - less sparse
Admissions policy
Main specialism
Arts (Operational)
SEN priorities
MLD - Moderate Learning Difficulty
Special classes
Has Special Classes
Investor in People
Committed IiP Status
Sixth form
Has a sixth form
Free school meals %
Learning provider ref #

rooms to rent in Norwich

Schools nearby

  1. 0.1 miles Cecil Gowing Infant School NR78NZ (177 pupils)
  2. 0.2 miles Falcon Junior School NR78NT (303 pupils)
  3. 0.4 miles Sprowston Junior School NR78EW (210 pupils)
  4. 0.4 miles Sprowston Infant School NR78EW (173 pupils)
  5. 0.4 miles Sparhawk Infant School & Nursery NR78BU (171 pupils)
  6. 0.5 miles Heartsease High School NR79DF
  7. 0.5 miles The Open Academy NR79DL (597 pupils)
  8. 0.7 miles Heartsease Community Middle School, Norwich NR79UE
  9. 0.7 miles Heartsease First School NR79UE
  10. 0.8 miles Heartsease Primary School NR79UE
  11. 0.8 miles Heartsease Primary Academy NR79UE (461 pupils)
  12. 0.9 miles Woodside First and Nursery Community School, Norwich NR79XD
  13. 1 mile Mousehold Infant & Nursery School NR34RS (293 pupils)
  14. 1 mile St Christopher's School NR67DE
  15. 1.1 mile White Woman Lane Junior School NR67JA (253 pupils)
  16. 1.1 mile George White Junior School NR34RG (199 pupils)
  17. 1.1 mile Sewell Park College NR34BX (862 pupils)
  18. 1.1 mile Nor07 - Norfolk Reintergration NR34RG
  19. 1.2 mile St William's Primary School NR70AJ (422 pupils)
  20. 1.2 mile Old Catton CofE VC Junior School NR67DS (157 pupils)
  21. 1.3 mile Wellesley First School NR14NT
  22. 1.3 mile Lionwood Junior School NR14HT (194 pupils)
  23. 1.3 mile Beechcroft Study Centre NR70LS
  24. 1.4 mile Magdalen Gates Primary School NR31NG (196 pupils)

List of schools in Norwich

School report

Sprowston Community High


Cannerby Lane, Sprowston, Norwich, NR7 8NE

Inspection dates 10 March–22 April 2015
Overall effectiveness This inspection: Requires improvement 3
Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3
Leadership and management Require improvement 3
Behaviour and safety of pupils Require improvement 3
Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3
Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3
Sixth form provision Requires improvement 3

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
The school has the following strengths

Standards have not risen quickly enough since the
The progress of disadvantaged students and those
The work of subject leaders has only recently led
last inspection. GCSE results in 2014 show that
too many students, including the most able, made
insufficient progress from their starting points.
to marked improvements in the quality of teaching
which has yet to be demonstrated in raised
who are disabled or who have special educational
needs has not been rapid enough to narrow the
attainment gaps in English and mathematics
between them and other students in school and
The quality of teaching is too variable to raise the
Where lesson activities are not matched to the
The school’s work to address under-achievement in
achievement for different groups of students rapidly
enough. Some teachers do not yet have high
enough expectations of the quality and quantity of
work that students will complete.
needs of learners, their attitudes to learning
the sixth form has not yet lead to enough
improvement in A level results.
Effective target-setting, marking and feedback are
Senior leaders and governors are demonstrating
steering improvement and accelerating students’
progress. Leaders make good use of assessment
information to target support for individual
success in driving improvements to teaching that
has resulted in the faster progress of groups since
September 2014.
The school makes good provision for the spiritual,
The school’s provision for the safety of students is
moral, social and cultural development of students,
both in lessons and through other opportunities
within the school day.
good. It has effective policies in place to protect
them, and strategies to tackle bullying are valued
by students.

Information about this inspection

  • Inspectors visited 50 lessons in a range of subjects and across the three key stages. Eight joint
    observations were carried out with members of the school’s senior leadership team.
  • Inspectors also observed the school at work at other times in the school day, and saw staff working with
    small groups of students.
  • The inspection team held meetings with four groups of students, with members of the governing body,
    two representatives of the local authority, the headteacher and staff.
  • Inspectors considered the 176 responses received through the Parent View online survey.
  • Inspectors scrutinised the school improvement plan, records relating to the quality of teaching, data
    relating to the attainment and progress of students, school policies and procedures, and the arrangements
    for safeguarding pupils.
  • Inspectors analysed 75 questionnaires completed by members of staff.
  • Inspectors attended an assembly and observed the work of several tutor groups.
  • Two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors returned to the school on 22 April to complete the inspection. They
    visited an additional nine lessons, scrutinised students books, analysed assessment information and held
    meetings with the schools’ leaders.

Inspection team

Anthony Sharpe, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
John Daniell Her Majesty’s Inspector
Jennifer Carpenter Additional Inspector
Colin Daglish Additional Inspector
Christine Mayle Additional Inspector
Tim Bristow Her Majesty’s Inspector
Paul Brooker Her Majesty’s Inspector

Full report

Information about this school

  • This school is much larger than most secondary schools.
  • The very large majority of the student population are White British.
  • The proportion of students who are disabled, or who have special educational needs is below average.
  • The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives the pupil premium is lower than the national
    average. This is additional government funding for students who are eligible for free school meals and
    those in local authority care.
  • The number of students from minority ethnic backgrounds is well below average, as is the proportion who
    speaks English as an additional language.
  • A small number of students attend alternative provision and other vocational courses that are located
    away from the main school site. This includes courses provided at City College, Easton College and work-
    related courses in beauty and construction.
  • The school meets the current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for the attainment and
    progress of students.

What does the school need to do to improve further?

  • Improve the quality of teaching, including in the sixth form, by:
    ensuring that teachers have high expectations of the quality of students’ work and the amount they will
    making sure that lesson planning caters well for the needs of individual students, and groups of
    students and challenges learners of different abilities.
  • Improve the achievement across the school by:
    ensuring that all teachers take responsibility for addressing weaknesses in students’ writing
    increasing the rate of progress of disadvantaged students, and those who are disabled or who have
    special educational needs
    closing the gap between these students and the achievement of other students nationally
    ensuring that the sixth form builds on better AS level results to strengthen achievement at A level.

Inspection judgements

The leadership and management require improvement
  • Results in 2014 show that senior and middle leaders did not appear to have had sufficient impact on
    improving teaching and achievement since the last inspection. This year, the better progress of different
    groups of students and the strengthening of teaching, for example in the science and mathematics
    departments, show that while not yet good, leadership is increasingly effective.
  • The headteacher and other leaders have worked well together to raise the expectations of all staff and
    dismiss complacency. They have balanced well the need for support and challenge, and have had to make
    some difficult decisions to ensure that all the team are able to rise to these expectations.
  • Senior leaders and governors have an accurate view of the school’s recent and current performance.
    Following the disappointing results in 2014, they have taken appropriate action to strengthen teaching and
    assessment procedures. Consequently, teachers are keeping a careful check on the progress of students
    so that they do not slip behind.
  • Senior leaders and governors are aware of the gap between students’ achievement nationally, and
    disadvantaged students, disabled students and those who have special educational needs in this school.
    Steps have been taken to strengthen the leadership of this aspect of the school’s provision. Assessment
    data is used effectively to target intervention and support for individual students, and ensure that support
    is both timely and sharply focused.
  • Leaders have provided teachers with effective guidance to improve their teaching. For example, the 12
    features of a good lesson are expectations that are understood by all. Leaders are knowledgeable about
    the different strengths and weaknesses of teachers and recognise that they now have to provide more
    bespoke training opportunities for teachers according to their needs.
  • Middle leaders adopt different approaches to developing teaching, and the impact of their leadership is
    variable in this respect. Effective leadership in science, the humanities, design and technology and
    mathematics has established consistently strong routines, for example in marking. Whereas in the creative
    arts, modern foreign languages and information and communication technology the leadership of teaching
    has had less impact in improving consistency.
  • Pupil premium funding is being used with increasing impact. Recent expenditure, for example, the crucial
    appointment of the student and family support worker in September 2014, has resulted in the barriers to
    learning for these students being identified and overcome. The inclusion team is effectively challenging
    middle leaders and teachers to ensure that they address the specific barriers to learning of these students.
    Stronger relationships have been established with the parents of these students to help them to be better
    prepared for the next stage in their education. The gaps in attainment still remain for these students, but
    the progress they make is much faster this academic year.
  • The school endeavours to promote equality of opportunity well. The much greater attention to the
    progress of different groups is aiding this, but the school recognises that there is still more to do to ensure
    that all groups of students achieve as well as they can.
  • Good relations are a strong feature of this school community. Discrimination is tackled well by good
    spiritual, moral, social and cultural provision within the curriculum and in assemblies.
  • The curriculum in Key Stages 3 and 4 has breadth and balance, and benefits from recent changes made
    by senior staff. It prepares students well for life in modern Britain through relevant topics studied in the
    humanities and other subjects.
  • The achievement of students who attend alternative provision is monitored carefully by the school. These
    students attend regularly and achieve well.
  • Students value the advice and careers guidance they receive throughout the school. They are aware of the
    alternatives on offer for further study after Year 11, and they are encouraged to explore these choices.
  • The local authority has supported the school since the last inspection, to raise achievement in the sixth
    form. The school takes advantage of support from a range of different providers, for example the advice
    in mathematics is contributing to the strengthening of the faculty.
  • Arrangements for safeguarding students meet statutory requirements. Policies and procedures are in
    place, and are regularly reviewed. Staff receive regular training on child protection, and how to spot signs
    of abuse.
  • The governance of the school:
    Governance is increasingly effective. Since the last inspection, governors have developed a clear
    understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of teaching and of achievement. Their work in holding
    senior and middle leaders to account is appropriately challenging. For example, they have challenged
    leaders about provision in mathematics and the leadership and outcomes of disabled students and those
    with special educational needs, both pertinent issues. They have noted that while there have been
    improvements there is still more to do. They have a secure understanding of assessment data and
    consequently they have an accurate view of the school’s performance.
    Governors ensure that procedures to manage the performance of teachers is in place. Governors are
    much better at ensuring that teachers are rewarded appropriately for their performance.
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
  • The behaviour of students requires improvement. Attitudes to learning vary according to the quality of
    teaching students experience. Inspectors noted examples of low-level disruption in classes where the
    learning failed to engage students. Students’ attitudes are not consistently positive in lessons because
    some teachers’ expectations are not high enough. Some students take less pride in the presentation of
    their work and are not tackled to improve it by teachers.
  • While inspectors observed some boisterous behaviour during break and lunchtimes, most students behave
    well outside of lessons. They generally take care of the school environment.
  • Teaching assistants intervene effectively during lessons to secure better attitudes to learning of students
    showing signs of disengagement.
  • Attendance is rising and is broadly average. Punctuality is generally good because the school has policies
    to challenge and improve this aspect of their behaviour.
  • The behaviour of students attending alternative provision away from the school site is good.
  • The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Systems for safeguarding meet statutory
    requirements. Risk assessments are in place where appropriate. There are clear routines to follow-up poor
    attendance and monitor students who are taken off the school roll.
  • The school maintains good records of the actions taken in response to serious incidents. Policies and
    procedures are reviewed regularly.
  • Senior managers maintain good records of students excluded from school and review them regularly.
    Permanent exclusions are above average, but are falling. Fixed-term exclusions are lower than average
    and are also improving.
  • Students feel safe in school. They report that when bullying takes place, the school responds effectively.
    Incidents of homophobic bullying are rare, as are racist incidents. Incidents of online bullying of students
    do occur but students told inspectors that staff help them to deal with it effectively.
  • The large majority of parents feel that students are kept safe at school. A significant proportion of parents
    do not feel that the school deals effectively with bullying. However, many parents also said that they have
    no knowledge of such incidents and could not, therefore, express a view.
  • Systems for signing-in visitors are well established and effective.
  • There are suitable procedures to ensure students who attend alternative provision away from the school
    are kept safe.
The quality of teaching requires improvement
  • Teaching requires improvement because the good features of teaching are not well enough developed
    across the school. For example, in some subjects, teachers do not use the assessment information about
    students well enough to plan the next steps in their learning. Others, for example as observed in
    mathematics, are proving very effective at this.
  • The most-able students do not make as much progress as they could. It is evident that more is expected
    of these students in terms of the progress that they make over time, but it is not apparent from some of
    their books that the work that they are set is sufficiently challenging. Some disabled students and those
    with special educational needs do not get the support they need in lessons because teachers do not adapt
    work to address their specific learning needs.
  • Generally, teachers keep a much closer eye on the progress of students than they did at the time of the
    last inspection and have much higher expectations of what they can achieve. However, this is not always
    reflected in the students’ books. Some teachers accept work that is not of high enough quality, nor is
    there enough of it in some cases. For example, the presentation of work is not as good as it should be,
    and students perform to a higher level for some teachers than they do for others, because more is
    expected of them.
  • In some subjects, middle leaders do not establish the academic strengths and weaknesses of students
    when they join the school. Without this information they are unable to plan learning effectively or
    accurately assess the impact of teaching in their subjects on students’ progress.
  • Students are aware of their target and current grades; some are unable to explain what they must do to
    improve them. However, others are very clear about the next steps that they must take and are
    complimentary about the advice they receive from teachers both in their books and face to face.
  • Teaching assistants support students effectively in most lessons. Their subject knowledge is good, and
    they support learners well. In one textiles lesson, a teaching assistant with a high level of subject
    knowledge was deployed effectively to increase the rate of progress for students as they designed and
    made a skirt for their coursework.
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
  • Students’ progress in 2013 and 2014 remained significantly below expectations for the school as a whole,
    and across many different groups of students, including girls and boys, those from disadvantaged
    backgrounds, and those who are disabled or who have special educational needs. The school’s detailed
    assessment information indicates that, although there remains variability between different groups,
    progress has accelerated markedly this year. Inspection evidence supports the school’s view that
    underachievement is being successfully addressed.
  • The gap widened in 2014 between the attainment in English of the school’s disadvantaged students and
    other students nationally, to more than one GCSE grade. The gap within the school also widened to just
    under one grade. In mathematics the gap between disadvantaged students and other students nationally
    remained approximately one GCSE grade. The gap widened to more than a grade when compared to
    other students in the school. The attainment of disadvantaged students in the sixth form is broadly
  • In the last academic year, the proportion of disadvantaged students making the expected progress in
    English and mathematics was lower than others in the school and nationally. The current performance of
    disadvantaged pupils indicates that this gap is narrowing. Approximately 54% of disadvantaged students
    are expected to gain five higher-grade GCSEs including English and mathematics, compared to 70% of
    their peers. While a gap still remains, this would represent a marked rise in standards for disadvantaged
  • The progress of the most-able students is not as rapid as it could be and consequently the proportion that
    gained the higher grades A and A* in their English and mathematics GCSE results was below average in
    2014. The school’s assessment information paints a much more positive picture for 2015.
  • The school’s own data raises concerns about the current progress of students who are disabled, or who
    have special educational needs. School leaders acknowledge that some students’ needs are not being met
    in a number of lessons because, too often, teachers are unaware of students’ overarching individual needs
    and how to support these. For example, where literacy skills are a barrier to learning in a range of
    subjects, teachers do not appear to take a common approach to addressing them with the student so that
    they are overcome.
  • Students’ progress over time is accelerating. Observations during the inspection found that in nearly all
    lessons it was good or required improvement.
  • Early entries in GCSE English examinations have proved to be ineffective. School leaders decided to stop
    entering students early for examinations following a scrutiny of the results.
  • Most students who attend alternative provision for part of the week make good progress.
The sixth form provision requires improvement
  • The proportion of students achieving A* to B grades in A Level examinations is significantly below
    average. The proportion of Year 12 students attaining A* to B grades at AS Level was also low but
    improved in 2014. Currently, attainment at AS level is rising, shown by the average point scores attained
    by students, and the proportion of them achieving grades A* to E, as the school changes its entry criteria
    for courses.
  • Progress in the sixth form declined to significantly below average in 2014. In other years it has been
    average. Current progress made by sixth form students is improving. The head of sixth form has
    introduced systems to track their academic progress more closely, and this is having a positive impact.
  • Teaching over time in the sixth form requires improvement. In some subjects, there is limited interaction
    between teacher and students, and between students and their peers. This hampers the development of
    new skills and knowledge. In some lessons there was a lack of pace, due to a lack of challenge for
  • In the past, sixth form curriculum has not been fully appropriate for students. This has resulted in a
    significant proportion of students not continuing with their studies in Year 13. However, retention rates
    are starting to improve following changes to the curriculum and students value the guidance given
    regarding entry to the sixth form.
  • The school has strengthened the leadership capacity in the sixth form. The recently appointed head of
    sixth form has a vision for improvement which is being supported and facilitated by senior leaders.
  • Teachers’ A level subject knowledge is good. In one Year 12 graphics lesson, the teacher’s proficiency in
    industrial software helped students to progress well in their design work.
  • Behaviour in the sixth form is good. Students are encouraged to be role models for the rest of the school.
    Students are clear on strategies they must take to ensure their own safety as young adults. They receive
    detailed information on child sexual exploitation, grooming and abusive relationships. Attendance in the
    sixth form is now tracked closely and is rising.

What inspection judgements mean


Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that
provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils
are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or
Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all
its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their
education, training or employment.
Grade 3 Requires
A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not
inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months
from the date of this inspection.
Grade 4 Inadequate A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s
leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have
the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This
school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires
significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to
be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by

Ofsted inspectors.

School details

Unique reference number 121162
Local authority Norfolk
Inspection number 453578

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

Type of school Secondary
School category Community
Age range of pupils 11–18
Gender of pupils Mixed
Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed
Number of pupils on the school roll 1371
Of which, number on roll in sixth form 196
Appropriate authority The governing body
Chair Sally Porter
Headteacher Andrew John
Date of previous school inspection 20 March 2013
Telephone number 01603 485266
Fax number N/A
Email address reveal email: off…

print / save trees, print less