School etc

Alexandra Park Junior School

Alexandra Park Junior School
Brook Lane
Greater Manchester

phone: 0161 7708321

headteacher: Mrs I Barratt

reveal email: i…

school holidays: via Oldham council

332 pupils aged 7—10y mixed gender
360 pupils capacity: 92% full

170 boys 51%


160 girls 48%


Last updated: June 18, 2014

Primary — Community School

Education phase
Establishment type
Community School
Establishment #
OSGB coordinates
Easting: 393506, Northing: 403974
GPS coordinates
Latitude: 53.532, Longitude: -2.0994
Accepting pupils
7—11 years old
Census date
Jan. 16, 2014
Ofsted last inspection
Jan. 30, 2013
Region › Const. › Ward
North West › Oldham East and Saddleworth › Alexandra
Urban > 10k - less sparse
Investor in People
Committed IiP Status
Free school meals %

rooms to rent in Oldham

Schools nearby

  1. 0.2 miles Iqra High School OL41ER
  2. 0.3 miles Glodwick Infant and Nursery School OL41AJ (358 pupils)
  3. 0.4 miles Fitton Hill Junior School OL82LD
  4. 0.4 miles Greenhill Primary School OL41RR (493 pupils)
  5. 0.4 miles Greenhill Primary School OL41RR
  6. 0.5 miles Fitton Hill Infant and Nursery School OL82LQ
  7. 0.5 miles Broadfield Primary School OL81LH (370 pupils)
  8. 0.6 miles Roundthorn Community Primary School OL45LN
  9. 0.6 miles Horton Mill Community Primary School OL41GL (263 pupils)
  10. 0.6 miles Roundthorn Primary Academy OL45LN (261 pupils)
  11. 0.7 miles Breeze Hill School OL45JE
  12. 0.7 miles Medlock Valley Community School OL82PN (323 pupils)
  13. 0.8 miles Clarksfield Junior School OL41NG
  14. 0.8 miles Clarksfield Infant and Nursery School OL41NG
  15. 0.8 miles Alt Primary School OL82EL (310 pupils)
  16. 0.8 miles Coppice Infant and Nursery School OL81AP
  17. 0.8 miles Coppice Junior School OL81BD
  18. 0.8 miles St Martin's CofE Junior Infant and Nursery School OL82PY (264 pupils)
  19. 0.8 miles Alt Junior School OL82EL
  20. 0.8 miles Alt Infant and Nursery School OL82EL
  21. 0.8 miles Clarksfield Primary School OL41NG (473 pupils)
  22. 0.8 miles Alt Academy OL82EL
  23. 0.9 miles Werneth Junior School OL84BL
  24. 0.9 miles Werneth Infant School OL84BL

List of schools in Oldham

School report

Alexandra Park Junior School

Brook Lane, Oldham, Greater Manchester, OL8 2BE

Inspection dates 30–31 January 2013
Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3
Achievement of pupils Good 2
Quality of teaching Good 2
Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2
Leadership and management Good 2

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.
It is not yet an outstanding school because

Since the previous inspection, the school has
The school has been highly successful in
Achievement is good. Pupils make at least
improved the quality of teaching so that it is
now good. Teachers have high expectations
and teach interesting lessons. Some of the
teaching is outstanding.
improving the links with parents. Attendance
is above average.
good progress in reading, writing and
mathematics and attainment by the time they
leave is in line with national averages.
Behaviour is good, pupils are keen to learn and
The school is led and managed well due in no
Governors’ good awareness of the school’s
say they feel safe in school.
small part to the determined leadership of the
strengths and of areas to be developed further
ensures that they carry out their duties well.
Not enough teaching is outstanding.
Marking other than in literacy books is
Not enough is done in sharing outstanding
teaching practice across the school.
While the main parts of lessons are planned so
that the work set is challenging for all pupils,
this is not always the case in the introductory
activities planned, especially in mathematics.

Information about this inspection

  • The inspectors observed 20 lessons .The headteacher declined the invitation to undertake joint
    observations. Additional short visits in lessons were carried out to look at important issues such
    as how well pupils get on with their classmates and how well they behave.
  • Meetings were held with groups of pupils chosen at random, members of the governing body
    and with senior staff. Meetings were also held with a group of parents and with a representative
    from the local authority.
  • Inspectors heard pupils read and talked to them about the types of books they enjoy and why.
  • Pupils’ current work and available work and assessment from the previous academic year were
    scrutinised, including information which showed how well pupils do in English and mathematics.
  • No responses were received to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View). The school had carried
    out its own surveys of parents’ views and this information was provided for the inspectors to
    look at.
  • Most members of staff completed the voluntary staff questionnaire.

Inspection team

Geoffrey Yates, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
Terry Bond Additional Inspector
Kathryn McArthur Additional Inspector

Full report

Information about this school

  • The school is larger than the average-sized junior school.
  • The proportion of pupils supported through school action is above average.
  • The proportion of pupils supported through school action plus or with a statement of special
    educational needs is broadly average.
  • The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is high.
  • The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium funding (pupils known to be
    eligible for free school meals and those looked after by the local authority) is above average.
  • The school meets the current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations
    for pupils’ attainment and progress.
  • The school has achieved many awards including Healthy School status.

What does the school need to do to improve further?

  • Improve the quality of teaching so that more of it is outstanding by:
    – ensuring that lesson planning provides activities matched well to pupils’ needs throughout all
    of the lessons, especially in mathematics
    – making better use of marking so that pupils know what is needed to move them on in their
    learning in all subjects, not just in literacy
    – sharing more the very best practice in teaching amongst staff.

Inspection judgements

The achievement of pupils is good
  • When pupils join the school in Year 3, their attainment in English and mathematics is below
    average but there is some variation from year to year. They make at least good progress and by
    the end of Year 6 attainment is average in English and mathematics. This demonstrates good
    progress since the previous inspection where attainment was found to be below average.
    Parents and pupils themselves say that progress is good.
  • There are no significant variations in the achievement of boys and girls or between pupils from
    different minority ethnic groups. Pupils known to be eligible for free school meals achieve very
    well and make better progress than those not eligible. This is partly because the pupil premium
    funding is used well to provide additional support staff who help teachers in ensuring that any
    gaps in pupils’ learning are tackled well.
  • Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs receive good quality support as
    do those at an early stage of learning to speak English and achieve well as a result.
  • In the lessons observed pupils made good progress overall with progress in some lessons
    outstanding. Pupils are keen learners and rise to the challenges set for them by their teachers.
    For example, Year 6 pupils ably discussed differences in writers’ styles of writing with one pupil
    pointing out that one piece of writing was ‘more factual’. Comments made by the teacher such
    as, ‘there is no such thing as an incorrect opinion’, really encourage pupils to say what they
  • Attainment in reading is average, with clear evidence of an increasing number of pupils
    exceeding what is expected. For example, a group of Year 6 pupils is working towards Level 6,
    (the reading attainment level normally expected in Year 8 in a secondary school). Pupils talk
    happily about why they enjoy reading.
The quality of teaching is good
  • The quality of teaching has improved since the previous inspection and there is much strength in
    the teaching observed. For instance, teachers place a great emphasis on using questioning to
    establish what pupils have learnt and then question further to move that learning forward.
    Teachers throughout the school have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and learning.
  • Good use is made of teaching assistants in supporting pupils and of the learning mentor in
    helping to meet pupils’ individual needs.
  • In the outstanding lessons seen, a common theme was the pace of lessons and the variety of
    activities provided, matched very well to pupils’ needs. Where teaching was less strong, although
    there was a good match of work to pupils’ needs in the main part of lessons this was not
    consistent throughout the lessons. For example, tasks set in the opening part of mathematics
    lessons were not matched well to pupils’ different levels of attainment.
  • Relationships are outstanding and this results in pupils wanting to produce their very best work.
    One pupil’s poem describing an alien included the lines, ‘Head as round as a balloon, face like an
    apricot, and eyes like disco balls.’
  • The school has recently revised its marking policy. A good feature is that pupils respond to
    marking and improve their work. However, marking, other than in English, is not used
    consistently well in all classes.
  • Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs benefit from the help provided by
    support staff who are deployed effectively both within and outside the classroom.
  • Reading is taught well throughout the school. Pupils say they enjoy reading and are keen to talk
    about what they like to read.
  • Teachers promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Visits to places of
    interest and work done with schools in areas different from the school’s locality broadens pupils’
  • Parents spoken to during the inspection believe the quality of teaching is good, as do the pupils
    who spoke with inspectors.
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
  • This is a school where pupils get on very well with each other and with the staff. This is a key
    factor in ensuring that good progress is made.
  • The school’s own survey and discussions held with parents demonstrate that the school provides
    a safe environment and that pupils enjoy school and behave well.
  • Behaviour in lessons and around the school is mostly good. Pupils are polite, mostly well-
    mannered and are eager to talk. However, a small number of pupils sometimes forget in school
    corridors to let adults through doors before them. Pupils are very proud of their school. For
    example, pupils in the school’s steel band are rightly proud of performing.
  • A scrutiny of records and observations during the inspection demonstrates that behaviour over
    time is good rather than outstanding.
  • Pupils want to achieve well. They respond extremely well to the many opportunities provided for
    them to take on school responsibilities. They proudly wear their special badges to show, for
    example, they are finance managers, table monitors or personal assistants to their teachers.
    Being a member of the school council is seen by the pupils involved as being very important.
    During the inspection the pride children displayed in receiving awards during an awards
    assembly was a pleasure to see.
  • Pupils’ enjoyment of school can be seen in their above average attendance and the punctual way
    they arrive at the start of the day.
  • Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep safe and are confident that any issues they
    raise will be dealt with promptly by the school. They recognise dangers when using the Internet
    and know how to avoid these problems. They have a good understanding of different types of
    bullying. They are confident that should any issue ever occur, adults would deal it with fairly.
The leadership and management are good
  • The headteacher’s relentless drive for improvement, with the strong support of staff has been
    successful. A key factor has been the emphasis placed on working more closely with parents and
    carers to involve them in their children’s education. One parent with very little understanding of
    English commented via an interpreter that even though she now lived in a different area she still
    sent her child to the school because of the good links between home and school.
  • The management structure is effective and leaders at all levels have been instrumental in
    implementing initiatives to improve the quality of education pupils receive. These initiatives
    include before- and after-school activities that are well-attended.
  • Leaders and managers have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses drawn
    from rigorous monitoring, known within the school as ‘saturation monitoring’. The systems for
    recording and analysing information about pupils’ progress are thorough. They are
    supplemented well by teachers’ prior knowledge of each pupil as an individual.
  • Good leadership of the performance of staff has brought about improvements in the quality of
    teaching with teaching issues from the previous inspection tackled well. This has come about by
    leadership teams working alongside individual teachers, ensuring a greater consistency in the
    quality of teaching. Even so, not enough is done to share the very best practice, for example,
    sharing ways of ensuring that marking is always used well, not just in literacy lessons. The staff
    questionnaires indicate that staff think highly of the leadership of the school and of the provision
    made for their professional development.
  • All pupils have an equal chance to succeed without discrimination. The school celebrates the
    differences between pupils from all backgrounds and abilities, and meets all requirements for
    safeguarding children.
  • The curriculum is of a good quality, and is enhanced by the emphasis given not only in ensuring
    that basic skills are taught well but by making sure, for example, that pupils have wider learning
    experiences such as 2D and 3D art work with a visiting artist. The curriculum makes a strong
    contribution to the pupils’ good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils have a
    good understanding of right and wrong and take a great pride in caring for others.
  • The local authority has a good relationship with the school. It acknowledges that the school has
    improved and is now good and as a result now provides only ‘light touch’ support.
  • The governance of the school:
    Governance has improved since the previous inspection and is now good. The governing body
    discharges all its legal responsibilities well. Governors have a good awareness of the school’s
    strengths and areas for development. They have looked at school assessment data and had
    these explained to them when required. As such, they have a good understanding of the
    school’s performance and are rightly proud of the improvements made since the previous
    inspection. In order to have a greater understanding and say in school affairs, governors visit
    classrooms and are not afraid to ask searching questions. They keep a close check on the
    school’s budget, making sure that, for example, pupil premium money is used to good effect
    and for the purpose intended. Governors have a good understanding of how performance
    management is carried out. They ensure that good teaching is rewarded and that teaching
    which is less successful is tackled. The Chair of the Governing Body makes a point of
    interviewing all staff before they receive an improvement in salary as a result of performance

What inspection judgements mean


Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes
that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures
that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their
education, training or employment.
Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well
for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage
of their education, training or employment.
Grade 3 Requires
A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it
is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within
24 months from the date of this inspection.
Grade 4 Inadequate A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and
the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not
demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary
improvement in the school. This school will receive regular
monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and
requires significant improvement but leadership and management
are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular
monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

School details

Unique reference number 105626
Local authority Oldham
Inspection number 400790

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

Type of school Primary
School category Community
Age range of pupils 7–11
Gender of pupils Mixed
Number of pupils on the school roll 302
Appropriate authority The governing body
Chair Peter Widall
Headteacher Irene Barratt
Date of previous school inspection 21 October 2009
Telephone number 0161 7708321
Fax number 0161 9113152
Email address reveal email: ibar…


print / save trees, print less